RESUMEN
Antecedentes: El EVC isquémico agudo es una urgencia tiempo-dependiente en la
que la trombólisis intravenosa requiere minimizar el tiempo puerta-aguja; la
evidencia local sobre determinantes del retraso en hospitales de segundo nivel es
limitada. Objetivo: Analizar los factores asociados al retraso puerta-aguja en
pacientes con EVC isquémico agudo tratados con trombólisis intravenosa en el HGZ
No. 3 del IMSS, Aguascalientes. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional,
analítico, retrospectivo y transversal en expedientes de 2024; se registraron
variables sociodemográficas, prehospitalarias, logísticas intrahospitalarias, clínicas
e intervalos operativos, con análisis descriptivo, bivariado y regresión logística;
retraso definido como >60 min. Resultados: Se incluyeron 122 pacientes (69.1 ±
12.4 años; 58.2% hombres); 54.9% presentó retraso y la mediana puerta-aguja fue
de 61 min. Las causas más frecuentes fueron espera de tomografía (47.8%),
laboratorio pendiente (37.3%), ausencia de preaviso EMS (32.8%) y
preparación/dispensación del trombolítico (31.3%). En el modelo multivariado,
ambulancia (ORa 0.46), preaviso EMS (ORa 0.38) y código ictus (ORa 0.32) se
asociaron con menor retraso, mientras que puerta–TC (ORa 1.58 por +10 min) y
TC–aguja (ORa 1.41 por +10 min) aumentaron el retraso. Conclusiones: El retraso
puerta-aguja se relacionó principalmente con determinantes prehospitalarios y
logísticos intrahospitalarios, destacando la coordinación EMS, activación del código
ictus y optimización de tomografía y administración del trombolítico.
Palabras clave: EVC isquémico, trombólisis intravenosa, tiempo puerta-aguja.
ABSTRACT
Background: Acute ischemic stroke is a time-dependent emergency in which
intravenous thrombolysis requires minimizing door-to-needle time; local evidence on
determinants of delay in secondary-level hospitals is limited. Objective: To analyze
the factors associated with door-to-needle delay in patients with acute ischemic
stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis at General Hospital Zone No. 3 of the
Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS), Aguascalientes. Material and methods:
Observational, analytical, retrospective, and cross-sectional study of medical
records from 2024; sociodemographic, prehospital, intrahospital logistical, clinical,
and operational interval variables were recorded, with descriptive, bivariate, and
logistic regression analyses; delay was defined as >60 min. Results: 122 patients
were included (69.1 ± 12.4 years; 58.2% male); 54.9% experienced a delay, and the
median door-to-needle time was 61 min. The most frequent causes were waiting for
a CT scan (47.8%), pending laboratory results (37.3%), lack of EMS notification
(32.8%), and thrombolytic preparation/dispensing (31.3%). In the multivariate model,
ambulance (aOR 0.46), EMS notification (aOR 0.38), and stroke code activation
(aOR 0.32) were associated with shorter delays, while door-to-CT (aOR 1.58 for +10
min) and CT-to-needle (aOR 1.41 for +10 min) delays increased the delay.
Conclusions: Door-to-needle delay was mainly related to prehospital and
intrahospital logistical factors, particularly EMS coordination, stroke code activation,
and optimization of CT scan and thrombolytic administration.
Keywords: Ischemic stroke, intravenous thrombolysis, door-to-needle time.